Is the WL class good ive seen some complaints but also been told they are strong. To be perfectly honest i would like to play one of the strongest (OP) classes so would love some suggestions if WL are bad.
Thanks.
Are WL any good?
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Ads
Re: Are WL any good?
WL needs big buff to be honest. You should wait on rolling one. See below list for OP Order class breakdown.
DPS AM>WL
DPS WP>WL
ASW>WL
RU/Canada/Spain>EU
NA Prime>EU Prime
Re: Are WL any good?
Yes, WL is a very strong class. It has hyper mobility, probably the highest burst in the game in addition to CCs. Plus the pet hits pretty hard as well. It demolishes pugs while ZERO effort. (that's the main complaint, it feels cheap)
The cons are that its basically a single target class, so its role in warbands is limited. Also, premade groups can quickly focus and kill the pet leaving you without most of your burst potential.
If you like the idea of destroying average players, squishies or pugs in 2-3 buttons and feel OP, its definetely a good choice for you. However keep in mind that the more organized the opposition becomes, the more irrelevant your kit will be.
The cons are that its basically a single target class, so its role in warbands is limited. Also, premade groups can quickly focus and kill the pet leaving you without most of your burst potential.
If you like the idea of destroying average players, squishies or pugs in 2-3 buttons and feel OP, its definetely a good choice for you. However keep in mind that the more organized the opposition becomes, the more irrelevant your kit will be.
- TenTonHammer
- Posts: 3807
Re: Are WL any good?
Only class in the game with frontload burst whose entire concept is kinda stupid in a pvp game, look at order and you can see that the number of that class outnumbers every other mdps.
The only time you will struggle is if you do "competitive 6v6", not that it matters since that community is so small that its basically non existent
The only time you will struggle is if you do "competitive 6v6", not that it matters since that community is so small that its basically non existent
Re: Are WL any good?
All classes are good. Some are just more gooder than others.
Blame It On My ADD Baby...
Re: Are WL any good?
WL underperform in terms of survivability his mirror class. As well as SH after changes...
WL underperform in terms of aoe dmg his mirror class. As well as any aoe dps tree. It w
as changed for a short time but it was reverted, so now unlike Destro Order got only 1 aoe mellee.
WL underperform in terms of utility his mirror class. As well as many others.
WL outperform in terms of st dmg burst his mirror class. But not Sorc, WE, WH...
WL outperform in terms of mobility his mirror class. An others - except for SH.
WL Fetch is joke compared to Mara pull [which was buffed] since its dependable on pet - which bug a lot [lag, massive fights, zone changing and your pet is either running to other side of map or simply gone, playing loner aint much option since you loose most of your utility/cc without it] and die in no time.
All classes had major / minor changes to their skills/trees multiple times, some got massive buffs [and they kept them] WL had some changes but ppl whined and they got reverted [unlike WE, Maras or Sorc which are ridiculous at some point] - but all WL got is one aoe tactic [not even comparable to Mara stance] and everything else got reverted to pretty much vanilla state.
We were told WL is goin to be reworked... But after half year its all the same [probably "working as intended(r)"] and no word has been heard since...
WL underperform in terms of aoe dmg his mirror class. As well as any aoe dps tree. It w
as changed for a short time but it was reverted, so now unlike Destro Order got only 1 aoe mellee.
WL underperform in terms of utility his mirror class. As well as many others.
WL outperform in terms of st dmg burst his mirror class. But not Sorc, WE, WH...
WL outperform in terms of mobility his mirror class. An others - except for SH.
WL Fetch is joke compared to Mara pull [which was buffed] since its dependable on pet - which bug a lot [lag, massive fights, zone changing and your pet is either running to other side of map or simply gone, playing loner aint much option since you loose most of your utility/cc without it] and die in no time.
All classes had major / minor changes to their skills/trees multiple times, some got massive buffs [and they kept them] WL had some changes but ppl whined and they got reverted [unlike WE, Maras or Sorc which are ridiculous at some point] - but all WL got is one aoe tactic [not even comparable to Mara stance] and everything else got reverted to pretty much vanilla state.
We were told WL is goin to be reworked... But after half year its all the same [probably "working as intended(r)"] and no word has been heard since...
SM 82 / IB 82 / KOTBS 82 / WL 82 / WP 72 / SW 75
CH 77 / BG 6X / BO 6X / WE 6X / MAG 6X ...and others.
CH 77 / BG 6X / BO 6X / WE 6X / MAG 6X ...and others.
Ads
Re: Are WL any good?
The first is true for debuffs, not for CC utility. You can counter CC better on WL due to pounce.
Outside 6vs6 and bigger, the pet lives long enough to do its work. Pet cd is short and can be called on the move. Compare it with SH.
Dying is no option.
Re: Are WL any good?
Anyone already mentioned WL is a melee class WITHOUT the MAIN drawback of being melee?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests