Now that we have a new really cool reason to PVE again and also word that more sets like this may come in the future. I was curious what everyone thinks about if the ICD was able to be removed for PVE for COV/COC (and WP damage prayer) - would it generally be accepted?
I understand the proc meta and being abusing it with multiple DoK's, potent covs, blood thirst and a sorc is what sorta made all this happen in the first place. But PVP aside, I have two questions.
1. Is it possible to remove the ICD for PVE? Maybe just remove it if you are not flagged for RVR?
2. Would it be a huge deal/Would it be accepted by the pop?
I was just curious what people thought/if this was even possible without client control. I've semi given up on the ICD removal for PVP and I think people are forgetting it was ever different. Maybe it is for the best. But for someone who loves to grind mobs just because it may be your happy time or you generally enjoy doing it and unlocking different titles and so forth.
Thanks for your time,
Convert
Sorry put this in chaos on accident!!!
DOK ICD PVE (Question/Opinion)
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Ads
Re: DOK ICD PVE (Question/Opinion)
point is ICD is a bad solution external CD is better cuz work on single person as an ICD but can proc at same time on more ppl on the AOE.
Re: DOK ICD PVE (Question/Opinion)
Yeah I mean if they could do external CD then I personally think a class designed around "procs" and faster AA does not NEED an ICD. The procs really don't hit for that much in general unless the target is debuffed. This post was primarily about being able to turn them off for PVE just for farming purposes and maybe as a step in the right direction.
I was told that it was not possible with current limitations be them technical limitations or time limitations I do not know. But bottom line I do not think the ICD should apply to actual DoK/WP at all... I mean for the DoK it is literally why they do less damage yet the class gets faster AA's and dual wield, it was meant to proc additional damage while have less damage with the actual hits.
I was told that it was not possible with current limitations be them technical limitations or time limitations I do not know. But bottom line I do not think the ICD should apply to actual DoK/WP at all... I mean for the DoK it is literally why they do less damage yet the class gets faster AA's and dual wield, it was meant to proc additional damage while have less damage with the actual hits.
- catholicism198
- Posts: 1092
Re: DOK ICD PVE (Question/Opinion)
Almost anything is possible with client control...but they've already seem to have told you that.freshour wrote:Spoiler:
So you have to wait it out.
Discipline and Priest are going to be reworked anyways. The reintroduction of Divine Strike and Consume Essence are a given.
...and I wouldn't equate mindless mob farming to PvE.
Re: DOK ICD PVE (Question/Opinion)
mob or not mob farm a icd kill any interation if an ECD is so much a problem you can cut half the proc but at least procs are not blocked anymore when you do aoe
- catholicism198
- Posts: 1092
Re: DOK ICD PVE (Question/Opinion)
Uh-oh. Sounds like it's time for another DEV rework reveal.Torquemadra wrote:Not removing it, proc meta is still too strong and its not being separated to work differently in pve.
Ads
Re: DOK ICD PVE (Question/Opinion)
Okay, I know you don't like being questioned but I am only asking for clarification on this one because I was told completely the opposite (if what you are saying is you'll never remove the ICD regardless of client control)Torquemadra wrote:Not removing it, proc meta is still too strong and its not being separated to work differently in pve.
Are you saying
Spoiler:
Re: DOK ICD PVE (Question/Opinion)
Torquemadra wrote:
Firstly I care nothing for whatever knowledge you imagine you have regarding what staff played or didnt play and secondly I thought I was pretty clear, Im not really one to mince my words.
That was why I asked for clarification because it wasn't clear at all. So I gave 2 possible conclusions that could be drawn from what you said. But... I'll take the insult and super nice reply as never removing it lol. No idea why you have to have such a tone with me all the time. Literally have done nothing but try and be nice to you and the staff for over a year. But anyway, thanks for the reply.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests