Recent Topics

Ads

Is it not too big?

Black Orc, Squig Herder, Choppa, Shaman
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
reynor007
Posts: 521

Re: Is it not too big?

Post#11 » Thu Mar 24, 2022 5:53 pm

Fenris78 wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 3:24 pm Doesnt seem remotely balanced with AM's counterpart, wich only boost the channeled duration of one skill.

Looks like to be 240 toughness reduction (with maxed tree), wich is in fact a buff to everyone else by 240 offensive stat. Merry Christmas.

Max debuff value on every other DoT in the game is about 120, and is generally not aimed at a so much universal damage reducing stat as Toughness (most similar debuffs affecting one magic resistance, initiative or offensive stats).

So either nerf/remove this added debuff (on a 20s duration DoT its out of proportion, I agree) to match the mirrored tactic, or give similar effect to AM's Radiant Lance via mirrored tactic.

Shaman already got intelligence stealing for free, the toughness debuff is absolutely insane, and on a spammable spell wich will benefit to every ally around, it's nonsense to be this powerful, even on a 11pts tactic.
in my opinion, the balance sham and am is now perfect, apart from this tactic, which often gives more minuses than pluses
a free pillbox of the shaman's intellect will receive. ama had 4 dot vs 2 dots sham
I can list all the changes for a very long time, but now they +- are equal
WH - mdpv 80+
WE - Witchrage 80+

Ads
User avatar
Battlefield
Posts: 382

Re: Is it not too big?

Post#12 » Thu Mar 24, 2022 6:06 pm

Sulorie wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 5:52 pm It's just about 100 additional toughness debuffed compared to the core aoe toughness debuff. The damage difference is ignoreable. Did you identified this to be the reason you lost in some fight or what is the point of this thread?
Other classes have different goodies and not all can be measured with raw stat attributes.
Shaman spotedd :mrgreen:

User avatar
Bavradai
Posts: 94

Re: Is it not too big?

Post#13 » Thu Mar 24, 2022 6:33 pm

The shaman has to take a -20% healing debuff to take this tactic.
It is absolutely fine.

User avatar
Fenris78
Posts: 788

Re: Is it not too big?

Post#14 » Thu Mar 24, 2022 6:42 pm

Bavradai wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 6:33 pm The shaman has to take a -20% healing debuff to take this tactic.
It is absolutely fine.
Maluses are the same for mirror tactic on AM. Only Sham version got free bonus, and one that will only buff everybody hitting target, while providing more value than any other debuff (yes 100 more than average stat debuff wich will overlap).

User avatar
Battlefield
Posts: 382

Re: Is it not too big?

Post#15 » Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:00 pm

Bavradai wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 6:33 pm The shaman has to take a -20% healing debuff to take this tactic.
It is absolutely fine.
But when you see 216-240 thoughness debuff on yourself too often, It is not absolutely fine !

User avatar
Vri
Posts: 608

Re: Is it not too big?

Post#16 » Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:19 pm

I think you just want to throw some meat to the dogs and watch them fight lol

User avatar
Bavradai
Posts: 94

Re: Is it not too big?

Post#17 » Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:19 pm

Battlefield wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:00 pm
Bavradai wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 6:33 pm The shaman has to take a -20% healing debuff to take this tactic.
It is absolutely fine.
But when you see 216-240 thoughness debuff on yourself too often, It is not absolutely fine !

Just cleanse it, bro.

User avatar
zulnam
Posts: 760

Re: Is it not too big?

Post#18 » Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:26 pm

New 6-man/24-man meta, DPS Shaman.
Link to build.
SW, Kotbs, IB, Slayer, WP, WL, SM, Mara, SH, BG

Ads
Sulorie
Posts: 7222

Re: Is it not too big?

Post#19 » Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:32 pm

Battlefield wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 6:06 pm
Sulorie wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 5:52 pm It's just about 100 additional toughness debuffed compared to the core aoe toughness debuff. The damage difference is ignoreable. Did you identified this to be the reason you lost in some fight or what is the point of this thread?
Other classes have different goodies and not all can be measured with raw stat attributes.
Shaman spotedd :mrgreen:
With what class you die to them? :P
Dying is no option.

User avatar
Battlefield
Posts: 382

Re: Is it not too big?

Post#20 » Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:00 pm

Bavradai wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:19 pm
Battlefield wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:00 pm
Bavradai wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 6:33 pm The shaman has to take a -20% healing debuff to take this tactic.
It is absolutely fine.
But when you see 216-240 thoughness debuff on yourself too often, It is not absolutely fine !

Just cleanse it, bro.
It does not change that is too big numbers and when besides you have many dots, so how should i cleanse it, if it's repeatable also ?

Dps classes have about 200 thoughness at all, it means that after they have 0 !

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests