City Siege

[demonzar1]

Im playing this game the last 5 years, when I find it after the live servers closed. I want to ask the developers of the server if in the future something gonna change with the city siege 24vs24 and will be like was on live. I think 24vs 24 is really boring and city siege is the end of the war, I think that must be 500 vs 500. thank you developers for your work, please answer me.

[Zamoth]

We already have an nearly unplayable lagshow called Fortress. So no, keep it 24vs24.

[demonzar1]

In fort you have to pass a small door in city will be different.

[EsthelielSunfury]

Not sure if such a drastic change would happen, and I personally think such high numbers are not needed, but to me at least City is a bit underwhelming compared to Fortresses. It feels like a glorified scenario. Still good as it stands, but would like more action into it.

[Foltestik]

Will be nice look at 100 of players running thrue streets of aldorf, but i believe it will be unplayable. But **** i wanna see it at least once

[xanderous]

Personally wish forts were 24vs24 with simmilar stages to city, the lag fest zerg is not engaging and everyone is basically just going through the motions with them till they get to city.

[demonzar1]

Any answer from dev. team?

[Twyxx]

The server would have an aneurysm.

[demonzar1]

I think that the server can handle 5wb vs 5wb in a city siege scenario.

[admanb]

Who plays through a 500v500 zerg in this game and goes “yes, that was fun. I want more of that.” If you want a turn-based game I recommend Civilization 5.

120v120 could be fun though.