Recent Topics

Ads

[Fortres abuse tactic]

We want to hear your thoughts and ideas.
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use

Structured class balance suggestions belong in the Balance Proposal subforum. Class-related discussion in this section are considered as ongoing debates and ARE NOT reviewed for balance changes.
chokeanutsman
Posts: 77

Re: [Fortres abuse tactic]

Post#11 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 4:56 pm

May as well keep it that way for now because when you win a defense successfully, it goes back to T4 RvR instead of having to go from T2 T3 T4.

No hard incentive to make people want a "crushing victory" really (where it makes you want to win in T2 T3 T4 to Fort)

Ads
User avatar
Martok
Posts: 1843
Contact:

Re: [Fortres abuse tactic]

Post#12 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:45 pm

I don't see this as abuse either. The third-floor defense isn't a guaranteed win for either side, just a sound strategy.
Blame It On My ADD Baby...

User avatar
Ototo
Posts: 1012

Re: [Fortres abuse tactic]

Post#13 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:57 pm

Martok wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:45 pm I don't see this as abuse either. The third-floor defense isn't a guaranteed win for either side, just a sound strategy.
This is my point of view too.
Spoiler:

User avatar
DanielWinner
Posts: 727
Contact:

Re: [Fortres abuse tactic]

Post#14 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:52 pm

OP got enough responses.
Ripliel - Shadow Warrior.
Riphael - Black Guard.

Very Serious Warhammer Online Montage
Spoiler:
Gotcha
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Asoga, IVendettaI, JohnnyWayne and 110 guests