this should be compared to:
https://killboard.returnofreckoning.com/item/1854
this should be compared to:
https://killboard.returnofreckoning.com/item/1872
this should be compared to:
this should be compared to:
rady wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2026 10:04 amthis should be compared to:
https://killboard.returnofreckoning.com/item/1854
this should be compared to:
https://killboard.returnofreckoning.com/item/1872
nocturnalguest wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2026 9:54 am Its not about proper comparison, but rather pinpoint of procs "weight" that is incredibly subjective, build dependant and at the moment not properly accounted and highely likely will be not in future. RP would love their proc to stay for oRvR heal but get rid of it for DPS and on the opposite get rid of it for smallscale as healer but keep it as DPS (they've got 2 identical staffs, cmon why?!), Magus would love more stats instead of proc in pretty much any environment.
Issue is procs "weight" that are untied of actual gameplay. If we go futher into fort upgrades we will see that value for "5% chance to shock target for 385 Elemental damage" will now weight the same as Quickening VII. What would you pick on DPS class if you were to choose?
Yes, OP made some "fake" claims, but problem is still there even tho OP didnt correctly form it with words. And its way deeper.
There have been really awful "itemization" done each time, never anything was done in correct way. Some itemizations were unique (none mirrored) for classes, some were copycats, its whole lot of a mess, it was and it is now even worse.
So i dont think throwing rocks due to mistake done by OP aint skippable for keeping up yet another thread with rants and whine for itemization. I believe he raised proper issue that highlights illthought proc weighting and inconsistence of system as whole. Why? Declared design for healers offspec is being DPS, ok, should itemization support it? Why not. Should you mirror items if declared design is unification and standartization of everything? Why not.
Users browsing this forum: abtasiens, Bing [Bot], Hecksa, Minisynn, Sciberr, wildwindblows and 13 guests